WP9

Quality and Evaluation
This workpackage deals with the quality monitoring of the project. It is led by P6 University of Leeds.

The methodology will be formative evaluation from an observer standpoint (rather than participant-observer), leveraging on reflective practice (self-evaluation) from each partner. For reasons of efficiency it is likely to use questionnaires (with some open questions as well as closed) rather than extensive interviews, and to leverage on the self-evaluation of project participants. Details will be given in the Evaluation Plan.

There will be an interim evaluation report (Formative Evaluation Report) after Year 1 and a final evaluation report (Summative Evaluation Report) at the end of the project.

All four project meetings, the two IAC meetings and each workpackage will be formally evaluated as well as some of the key outputs, in particular the wiki.

P6 Leeds
The University of Leeds will carry out all central evaluation tasks.

Other partners
Self-evaluation, responding to evaluator questionnaires and requests for information.

Explanation of workpackage expenditures
The evaluator (at partner P6) will be expected to attend all four face to face project meetings. Travel and subistence for this is covered under WP1, the same as for all other partners.

She is also expected to attend the four meetings of IAC. Travel and subsistence estimates are included for that in this WP.

No specific equipment or "other" expenditure is envisaged.

Since there is just one person working for P6, just one rate is charged in the "Staff costs" in the detailed budget.

> Part F >>> Main Page